Contents
►
Editors' Remarks
►
The New Museum: Thousands of
Visitors a Day
►
“Etched Voices”: New Exhibitions
Pavilion Displays Contemporary Art
►
Inauguration of the New Synagogue
►
Education:
►
Focusing on Europe
►
Echoes and Reflections
►
Guides for the March of the Living
►
Events at the
International School for Holocaust Studies
►
Generation to Generation: Historic
Gathering of Survivors and their Families
at Yad Vashem
►
The Names Database: Collecting
Names, Memorializing Lives
►
Their Silent Cries: Hidden Child
Survivors of the Holocaust
►
News
►
Friends Worldwide
►
About the Magazine
►
Credits
►
Back Issues
►
Contact Us |
by Leah Goldstein
“Our daily existence was tied to two components: giving up our Jewish
identity and silence… Silence became deeply ingrained in all hidden
children.”
Nechama Tec, a hidden child survivor
From the Nazi perspecive, Jewish children were useless as slave laborers,
yet represented a threat of Jewish continuity. The fate of some 1.5
million children therefore meant automatic death. Yet miraculously, some
children managed to defeat their foes by going into hiding: either under
assumed identities with non-Jewish caretakers, or with their parents, in
camps, ghettos, and forests. For the entire period, these children were
forced to remain silent, either to conceal themselves, or at least so as
not to reveal their true identities.
However, silence continued to dominate the emotional and cognitive world
of child survivors long after their liberation, a phenomenon psychiatrist
and child survivor Robert Krell calls “secondary silencing.” In new
research featured in the upcoming Yad Vashem Studies (Vol 33), Sharon
Kangisser Cohen, adjunct professor in the school of History at the
University of New South Wales, interviews child survivors of the Holocaust
about their experiences, and asks why—for most of their adult lives—they
remained silent about their pasts. Kangisser Cohen concludes that the
silence of hidden child survivors in their postwar environment is based on
four main issues: learned silence, a hierarchy of suffering, a conspiracy
of silence, and elected silence.
During the war, to hide one’s Jewish identity, children learned silence as
a survival technique, a behavior difficult to unlearn even in the postwar
environment. More significantly, many of them felt that after the war
their experiences did not merit an audience because of the hierarchy of
suffering, which validated, to a greater or lesser degree, the traumatic
nature of different types of experience. The hidden children were not
usually perceived as Holocaust “survivors,” and so they ceased to identify
themselves as such.
Ariala was six years old when the war broke out, and went into hiding,
alone. After returning home following liberation, she found that adult
survivors, including her own father, were not willing to hear about her
experiences during the war: “I wanted to speak with my father about it, to
tell him that even if I had not been in the camps, I was beaten and that
it had been difficult for me too,” she explains. “But my father said:
‘Keep quiet, you could have been like Elianne [Ariala’s cousin]. You also
could have been in a camp, in a crematorium and everything.’ Therefore, I
kept quiet. I understood that I had been lucky.”
For those children who immigrated to Israel after the war, a further
challenge awaited them. Collective memory of the Holocaust in Israel
dictated that certain narratives of survival were heard, while others were
silenced. Ruth, a child survivor who spent the war years in hiding with
her family, recalls: “I didn’t feel that I was a… ‘survivor.’ I always
thought that a survivor was somebody that had been in Auschwitz. I didn’t
consider myself a survivor of the Holocaust.” Consequently, their stories
were notably absent from public discourse. Particularly powerful in this
conspiracy of silence were the many well-meaning adults who felt that by
“forgetting” the past, the children in their care would adjust more easily
to their new lives.
Indeed, some child survivors themselves welcomed silence as it enabled
them to become part of the “normal world” and pour their energies into
rebuilding a new life. Thus, they themselves elected silence, in order to
aid their own absorption and integration. Ehud, a hidden child survivor,
explains that the hidden children “had the need to deny, to forget what
once was, and to become a new person, in a new period.”
Kangisser Cohen concludes that for most hidden child survivors of the
Holocaust, their identity as survivors and their relationships to their
pasts were largely constructed in response to the values, judgments, and
guidance of their postwar environment. As the prevalent response of both
the adult survivor community and the adult community at large was not to
recognize, validate, or legitimize their suffering, it would take the
majority of hidden children more than half a century to give voice to
their traumatic past, and for them to identify publicly as Holocaust
survivors.
top
|

Pre-war photograph and identity card of hidden
child survivor Ehud Lev

The publication of Yad Vashem Studies is
assisted by the Memorial Foundation for Jewish Culture. |